College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

SANFORD: Immigrants deserve same rights as citizens

By Monica Sanford

Print this article

Published: Thursday, January 29, 2009

Updated: Thursday, January 29, 2009

Maybe I’m naïve, but I’ve always taken the founding words of this country seriously.  I’ve paid attention to what was put down on paper, carved into stone and enshrined in monuments.

Which is maybe why I’ve been confused these past few years as I’ve watched our government do one thing after another that left me blinking and wondering “Huh? How can they do that? Doesn’t the constitution say…?  What happened to equal rights and equal treatment before the law?  What country am I living in!?”

I’ve been baffled listening to government officials, elected representatives and everyday people arguing over seemingly unrelated things like State Children’s Health Insurance Program, immigration and Guantanamo Bay.  Each of these issues is rooted in the founding words of our country.

Too many politicians on the hill still don’t understand the guiding principles on which this nation was founded: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

The Declaration of Independence does NOT say “all United States citizens are created equal.”

Therefore, the rights held to be self-evident and unalienable for Americans MUST be held so for non-citizens as part of their basic human existence.

Yet just Tuesday, Morning Edition of National Public Radio reported a new controversy surrounding SCHIP.  Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., was outraged not because of the cost or how the program would be paid for, but by the fact that a provision was added to cover the children of legal immigrants.

“It would seem to me that we are giving more incentives for folks to come to the United States, not just to participate in the American dream, but to get on the government dole,” Ensign said. “And I think this is exactly the wrong direction we should be going with this legislation.”

So allowing a little Armenian or Pakistani or Sudanese child to die of pneumonia, an easily treatable disease, because their law-abiding parents couldn’t afford the doctor’s bills and waited too long to take them to the emergency room is a better option?  Does that send the right message?

Sen. Ensign, could you honestly look that child’s mother in the face and tell her that it was better for her family to struggle under the crushing weight of medical bills, for her son or daughter be terribly ill and unable to receive treatment, or, heaven forbid, even die, than to allow immigrants to think America might be a good place to live because at least they know their children can be healthy?

What makes immigrant children less important?  Aren’t they “created equal?”

People complain about illegal immigration and jobs being outsourced overseas.  Yes, it creates hardship for families when people lose their jobs, and anger is understandable.

The unfortunate tendency is to turn that anger into blame – all focused on that person who “took” away “your” job.  Anger and hatred and blame lead us to dehumanize the subject of our pain, to somehow make them less than we are, less deserving, less human.

The truth is, that person is just trying to care for themselves and their family in the same way that you were trying to care for yours. Don’t we all have the right to try to do what is best for our families?

While it is sad that some individuals need to break the law to do this, blame and hate are not the answers.  Laws need to be reformed and we need good foreign relations so that we can work with those countries whose citizens are illegally immigrating here in search of better futures.

Have we forgotten the words etched on the Statue of Liberty? “Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

Do we forget that it was these very huddled masses who made the United States a great nation?

Is our country to become America the Privileged?  A nation where we only care for those who have earned, by accident of birth, the title of citizen and ignore all the rest?

No. At least, not if President Obama has anything to say about it. Closing Guantanamo Bay was the first step in redressing the gross violation of human rights perpetrated by the Bush administration.

No matter what claims Bush may have made about the inmates there, that they are terrorists and criminals who hate America (which if they didn’t before, they certainly do now), he never claimed they weren’t human beings.

As human beings, one of their unalienable rights as set forth by the Constitution is that of habeas corpus, protection from unlawful detention. “The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion,” it states in Article One.

The “War on Terror” may be many things but I think even I would have noticed a rebellion or invasion. Unless, of course, the authors were referring to us being the invaders, which I doubt.

I hope President Obama agrees and, in addition to closing Guantanamo Bay, he either swiftly brings to trial or releases the prisoners.

Further, I hope Americans remember the principles and ideals on which this nation was founded – that all people have certain basic rights which no government, not even ours, may revoke, suppress or abridge – and that we learn how to apply those principles across the entire expanse of law and government.

Monica Sanford is a graduate student in architecture and community and regional planning. Reach her at monicasanford@dailynebraskan.com.

Comments

12 comments
rob
Wed Jul 22 2009 15:11
It is not a right to have food, transportation or health care, the way you people think is amazing! If you want something go out and get another job, manage your money better, whatever it takes. Anyone (chinese, mexican whatever) that is here illegal needs to go back immediately. If any of you idiots want to wake up and join a party of principal go www.lp.org
Internet
Fri Jan 30 2009 12:12
I don't want any more Mexicans in America.
plopsdad
Fri Jan 30 2009 07:34
Emily

Im a democrat but against illegal immigration. I have a very open mind when it comes to social issues and have a ton of sympathy for others---to a point. The taxes we pay should be going to help citizens of this country, not those who choose to disregard our laws, march in our streets and raise the Mexican flag above ours. Adn than still demand right for breaking our laws.

Susie Q
Thu Jan 29 2009 23:10
Monica - You have so much to learn! Your intentions are good and pure; however, it sounds as if you haven't paid many taxes yourself. As you grow older, you will begin to see that sometimes in life we have to choose the lesser of two evils...it's sad, but true. We will never be able to negotiate peacefully with terrorists because they are animals! The thing people fail to see is that these people don't think like we do at all and they have no regard for human life. I appreciate your wishes for a better society but you're going to have to get real honey. I think you and I can both agree that there is and always will be hope for better times.
Jamie G.
Thu Jan 29 2009 22:47
There are no such thing as rights, only privileges that we grant one another.

(oh...and I'm a liberal-minded, politically independent, atheistic Buddhist)

Rob
Thu Jan 29 2009 16:44
The only legal significance of the Declaration of Independence is that it told King George III to bug off. Yes, it had a lot of aspirational language and declared that all men have the inalienable rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. But ask someone in the womb of a mother going to the abortion clinic if that language has any recognized legal significance. (Hint: Hurry or you won’t get the chance.) I suppose it could serve as precedent, in case the government gets really messed up . . . hmm. In other words, we could conceivably decide to “dissolve the political bands,” as the euphemism goes.

The Constitution does not always apply to aliens. An alien cannot sue under the Article 4 Privileges and Immunities clause, for example. Americans who were combatants for the other side are entitled to some Due Process, it has been ruled, but I doubt that enemy combatants really have the kind of Constitutional protection you seem to claim for them.

Look on the bright side. Article II, section 1 is nonjusticiable. I hope Arnold Schwarzenegger is watching. You don’t really have to be a natural-born citizen to be President, as Obama has proven. There is no procedure for enforcing that qualification, as the recent election has shown. That’s at least one small victory for those who are pro-immigration minded, and we didn't even need an Amendment to accomplish it.

Emily
Thu Jan 29 2009 16:41
Monica,
Great article, please ignore all of the nasty Repubicans comments above. They are extremely closed minded and apparently have no sympathy to people who come from hardships and turmoil. Thank you for writing this article, I realize it is extremely difficult to have a non-republican opinions in this state. Kudo
Great article, please ignore all of the nasty Repubicans comments above. They are extremely closed minded and apparently have no sympathy to people who come from hardships and turmoil. Thank you for writing this article, I realize it is extremely difficult to have a non-republican opinions in this state. Kudos.
Steve
Thu Jan 29 2009 16:02
Comment thing is malfunctioning I think. Apologize if this shows up twenty times if there is just a delay.
Emily
Thu Jan 29 2009 15:54
Monica,
Great article, please ignore all of the nasty Repubicans comments above. They are extremely closed minded and apparently have no sympathy to people who come from hardships and turmoil. Thank you for writing this article, I realize it is extremely difficult to have a non-republican opinions in this state. Kudos.
Carl
Thu Jan 29 2009 13:34
I think we need to deport you and strip you of citizenship. Maybe you love Al Queda also. I guess I will pass this on to INS and the CIA so they can investigate you. Hope you love cold prison cells.
Vance
Thu Jan 29 2009 13:30
Monica, your argument suggests that SCHIP is an inalienable right. Funny since SCHIP wasn't around until 1997, so apparently nobody had this "right" back in 1996. That's not very inalienable at all, and in fact too many people misunderstand what the Declaration of Independence says, means, let alone understand the concept of a human right. Government health care is by no means a right. Anything anyone gives you is not a right. Rights are inherent in us all and cannot be taxed or subsidized, which is how SCHIP is maintained.

It's interesting because individuals like yourself that use the Constitution or the Declaration in their arguments choose to only cherry pick what to follow. You somehow think government-run health care is a right (funny since none of us are born with it), yet I doubt you view the Second Amendment as favorably as it is written. Gun regulations are okay and requiring individuals to register them should be how it works in America even though the RIGHT to bear arms "shall not be infringed". Wish I could say the same about health care, because it's been around for thousands of years but only since the rise of Communism and socialist columnists has it suddenly become a right to be provided by the government.

Joe
Thu Jan 29 2009 09:02
Wrong. You use the typical agruements those who support illegal immigration use. First,the few lines on the Statue of Liberty are NOT an immigration policy. No matter how you bend or slant it, this country can not even take care of the citizens we have currently, having an open door policy will only make matters worse.






log out