Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

KEYES: Humane Society of the United States pushes anti-agriculture agenda

Published: Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Updated: Thursday, January 26, 2012 21:01

My roommates think I'm crazy because I refuse to eat at Chipotle. They get annoyed when I say I won't shop at Forever 21. And they think it's weird that I get sassy with them when they bring home a bottle of Yellow Tail wine.

You might agree with them now, but it's my hope that after you read this column, you might change your mind and join the likes of me.

You may be wondering, "Melissa – why on earth do you refuse to eat at Chipotle?! I mean, they have, like, the best burritos in Lincoln. And Forever 21?! My closet is, like, full of their clothes!" The reason is simple. Chipotle, Forever 21 and Yellow Tail wine support, or have supported, one organization that I don't quite agree with. This organization's main goal is to ruin what my family has worked for six generations.

The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) is America's largest animal advocacy group. In 2010, they brought in $131 million from supporters. So under first impression, we should think this $131 million funds our local humane societies. Wrong. I was punk'd, and so were you. Where's Ashton Kutcher?

HSUS isn't associated with your local humane society. Actually, of the $131 million that they brought in two years ago, only 1 percent was donated to local humane societies.

The main goal of this organization is to promote a totally vegan lifestyle and abolish all animal agriculture – not fund humane societies across the United States. If HSUS actually assisted local humane societies and didn't spend so much money on other purposes, I might support them.

How do they get so much money? I'm sure you've seen ads on TV, in magazines and on billboards of sad-looking puppies and one-eyed kittens. That's how they get you, your grandparents and the crazy cat lady that lives down the street. You feel bad for those dogs and cats that live in homeless shelters, so you send them your money.

Each day, HSUS uses its multi-million dollar budget to lobby and change policy that would make it harder for farms to stay in business. Some examples include banning gestation crates for sows (pronounced "sau"—a pregnant pig), tail docking in dairy cattle and cages for egg-laying hens.

We've had farms for years. American agriculture is advancing more and more every day, and that's a good thing! The population has doubled since 1954 and will double again by 2050. More people take up more space, which takes away from land that can be used for agricultural purposes.

Agricultural purposes include growing the food you eat, growing the fibers that make up your clothes and the material you use to build your home. Pretty important, I'd say.

Although I can't speak on behalf of every farmer and rancher in the world, I know that the majority of producers use humane practices every day. If we didn't, we wouldn't be successful.

Livestock are dependent on humans. They can't load up the feed wagon by themselves and put it in the bunk for their livestock friends. They depend on us to fill that wagon with feed and put it in front of them to survive.

If farmers didn't give their livestock the necessary environment to survive, then the farmer would be in a world of hurt, both legally and financially. The livestock may be that farmer's only means of income.

Don't think this means the farmer's only concerned about money. No farmer wants to see one of their own die or suffer because of something they neglected.

Many of the policies that HSUS lobbies for are harmful to agriculture. These policies will make food prices go higher and, quite frankly, decrease the amount of food produced, because it will be physically impossible to produce that much food for the world's growing population.

Gov. Dave Heineman is one of my favorite people because of all he does for the agricultural industry. He's openly against HSUS and he shows it. He knows the initiatives behind the organization and he knows it's a bad idea to allow them in Nebraska.

Gov. Heineman has said many times that if HSUS comes to Nebraska they will have to "fight for their life," and they will. Agriculture makes up one in three jobs in the state of Nebraska, and if HSUS wants to change that, then they'll have to fight against the governor, me and more than 47,000 farmers and ranchers in this state.

So, you might still think I'm weird, crazy or a little too sassy. But if that's what being passionate about being able to grow your food will take, then that's what I'll do.

melissa keyes is a junior agricultural journalism major. she blogs at borninabarn-melissa.blogspot.com, and can be reached at melissakeyes@dailynebraskan.com.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

24 comments

Anonymous
Tue Jan 31 2012 13:05
Those poor animal farmer. They can't get no respect. JKJK. You Dumb.
Anonymous
Mon Jan 30 2012 19:58
A good way to combat HSUS is to inform your elected officials about the organization's history of fundraising scandals, including a major Hurricane Katrina fraud investigation by the Louisiana Attorney General. Let them know that not only does HSUS rake in huge amounts of money through deception, it wastes as much as 49% on fundraising, earning a D grade from Charitywatch. The other 51% goes to lobbying (far in excess of IRS rules for tax-exempt charities), 50 lawyers and a PR, advertising and media army larger than many major taxpaying corporations. HSUS does not have anywhere near the 11 million members CEO Wayne Pacelle regularly claims when trying to get legislators to support his political agenda.

A public association with HSUS is unwise and potentially damaging for ethical government officials.

Anonymous
Mon Jan 30 2012 18:22
I think it is sad that the American public continues to give money to these orginazations like HSUS people need to take the time to learn where their money is going. They are trying to pass laws here in alabam that will jeprodise doctor patient confidentuality. I used to think it was an animal help group myself and thought they did good before I looked at them better. If they have their way we won't have enough produced food, or the right to hunt and fish for food enough to feed our family's. I wish I knew how to get people to wake up. I tell everyone who will listen the truth about them.
Joey D.
Mon Jan 30 2012 12:30
Support animal agriculture: Occupy a steak house!
Anonymous
Sat Jan 28 2012 17:07
I'm increasingly convinced that animal rights groups have heightened the skill of managing conflict to an art. They've discovered that conflict is a high energy emotional state. They have learned how confusion and conflict go hand in hand with their progressively emerging agenda. They have learned how to skillfully harness this energy for financial gain. By their actions it seems clear that education and resolution are not high on their agenda. Moral entrepreneurs have worked with science and facts in recent history to enact stiffer laws against drunk driving, develop say no to drug campaigns and to increase public awareness of the risks of smoking. These have all been open and overt facts based campaigns. The animal rights movement is anything but overt. Their hidden and dishonest process of developing funding needs to be better dissected and made public.
I actually tell my children to never refer to any action by themselves or others as "stupid" unless it is a willful act against the health or best interest of themselves or others. Examples include recreational drug use, or cigarette smoking, or driving off a cliff, or participating in willful acts against the hand that feeds. It's my developing opinion that, in their current form, organizations that ultimately seek the right for non-human animals to pursue happiness as equals with people... represent a misleading, wasteful and stupid waste of effort. Animal agriculture deserves much better. Animal agriculture deserves a great deal more gratitude.
Rog
Fri Jan 27 2012 18:55
I raise beef. I give my steers grain. I try to pick bulls that, when bred to my cows, will produce more marbling in the meat. Why? It is the kind of meat I like to eat; it is awesomely delicious. It is much, much more expensive to produce. However, producing that quality beef makes me happy. I really enjoy it when my customers tell me how delicious my beef is. Those compliments spur me on and further my happiness. I thought I had the right to "the pursuit of happiness" in this country. Guess what? Stressing my animals out ruins their meat; it produces what are know as dark cutters. Nasty tasting meat. You can tell me I'm destroying the world by graining my steers if you want. You can tell me I'm a selfish pig only pursuing the almighty dollar (My beef operation lost money last year.) That is your opinion, you are entitled to it. Pretty sure a good share of orphaned children in Haiti, Ethiopia and Kenya whose mothers have died from AIDS, would appreciate it if they could get the care and comfort I give my cows.... just sayin.
Anonymous
Fri Jan 27 2012 18:47
Thank you Melissa for putting a voice to my exact thoughts!
I would prefer to put my $19/month to the Wounded Warrior fpundation rather than the HSUS
Anonymous
Fri Jan 27 2012 16:31
HSUS finances can be found (their annual 990 reports) at www.guidestar.org
Anonymous
Fri Jan 27 2012 08:24
Excellent article. H$U$ is an animal rights extremist group like PeTA or ALF. Even more, H$U$ CEO is a former spokesman of ALF (a terrorist group, according to FBI). Their only goal is to completely destroy agriculture as well as medical research.
Anonymous
Thu Jan 26 2012 18:52
Very good article, Melissa! Keep up the good work of informing about agriculture and factors that influence agriculture!
Anonymous
Thu Jan 26 2012 18:16
Nice job, Ms. Keyes.

Anyone studying HSUS or factory farming complaints should borrow the propaganda film FOOD, INC from the library (I feel sorry for anyone that paid to see it). The movie (like HSUS) uses a few points that cause people to react emotionally, then portray the emotional issue as if it is the norm across all industry. FOOD, INC does a good job of blasting Monsanto for proprietary control of soy beans (such as Monsanto's litigation against farmers who save part of the crop to plant later, which violates agreements), and their use of statistical data is very effective at making Monsanto look bad. Ms. Keyes could definitely strike a harder blow on HSUS with good data, but as published, she's done good work.

MidWestFarmGal
Thu Jan 26 2012 16:21
I agree 100% with Ms. Keyes. My family has been against HSUS for quite some time now. The HSUS commercials are very misleading. HSUS welcomed Michael Vick with open arms, after a very generous donation, is so demeaning to real animal lovers. HSUS also claims to be a charity therefore getting tax free status so they pay NO TAXES yet lobby all the time against Agriculture/Animals and pay out high salaries and into retirement funds. All one has to do is research into public accounts
to find the truth for themselves.
MidWestFarmGal
Thu Jan 26 2012 16:18
I agree 100% with Ms. Keyes. My family has been against HSUS for quite some time now. The HSUS commercials are very misleading. HSUS welcomed Michael Vick with open arms, after a very generous donation, is so demeaning to real animal lovers. HSUS also claims to be a charity therefore getting tax free status so they pay NO TAXES yet lobby all the time against Agriculture/Animals and pay out high salaries and into retirement funds. All one has to do is research into public accounts
to find the truth for themselves.
AB
Thu Jan 26 2012 15:27
while ms. keyes is just scratching the surface she is correct in her assesments of both HSUS and the livestock ag sector as a whole...this is an editorial, i dont want a buch of statistical data taking up word space in an opinion piece, but i understand the numbers she is referring too and i encourage anyone to look throght the USDA's ag stats data base and compare with some of the independent research available as well as the multiple university trials which expound on the earlier claim that cruel practices produce less dollar amounts, thereby debunking the claim that farmers and ranchers are just a bunch of sinister beasts with dollar signs for eyeballs...as for the factory farming and anti-Monsanto speak on the board ealier: refer to Bill Gates most recent comments (from earlier today) concerning bio-tech and a growing world...what has Monsanto done that is so bad? they have helped us push through walls in production yield and product QUALITY no one thought was possible 25 years ago...we have the ability to produce food at a 1 farmer to 76 person ratio which was more like 1farmer:8persons 50 years ago...and companies like Cargill, ADM, Land O'Lakes provide the most essential services to farmers on the output side of production by providing infrastructure and processing...its cute to say things like "we should use corn for food, not fuel" and "they are killing the family farm" but those statements are far from true...because of the value added processing provided by these organizations for procucts like corn and soybeans which are not readily edible with out said processing and the shipping infrasturcture support they provide, we are able to ship Nebraska products to nearly every country in the world, not to mention every corner of our country...whole foodies cant do that, local foodies cant do that...so yes, ms. keyes: please do write a piece on "factory farming" and "big Ag"...these arent dirty words, they are the best chance the family farmer has to succeed in a growing global marketplace...
Crystal Cattle
Thu Jan 26 2012 13:34
It is pretty easy to get access to HSUS financial information. You can google it or check out Humane Watch. Great job Melissa. I haven't eaten at HSUS for years.
Anonymous
Thu Jan 26 2012 13:19
I would like to see sources to back up the financial stats. I'm 100% pro-ag, but I think this article would be a lot more credible if it was supported by financial data showing where ASUS's money goes. It would bolster Melissa's argument.
Jim
Thu Jan 26 2012 12:17
If Ms. Anonymous knew anything about farming or animals, she would know that "cruel or painful practices" do not make more porkchops or steaks. They make considerably less. That's why modern farming strives to make animals comfortable and stress free. Happy animals mean more $ for the producer and a better product for the consumer. Farmers across North America are producing a great product.
Anonymous
Thu Jan 26 2012 11:21
Rather than target HSUS, why not target factory farming? I don't support HSUS, but my lack of support is exactly as you stated - they don't use their dollars to actually save the animals they convince you they're saving.

However, animals raised for food purposes shouldn't be subjected to cruel or painful practices just to make a few extra porkchops or steaks. The reason people in the United States are starving has nothing to do with the HSUS not allowing certain farming practices. It's because the government is in bed with companies like Monsanto and other big agro firms - subsidizing farmers to not grow ANYTHING on their lands. Or insisting they grow corn or soy - not to feed people, but to feed the animals being marched through big agro mass production facilities - feeding them corn fattens them up before slaughter, providing the most profit. It's not because it's the healthiest, or because it provides more food to people who NEED it.

My friend grew up on a farm, and her family's dairy farm contracted with Land O' Lakes out of necessity - and slowly but surely, every year they offered her family less and less for their dairy products, while they made more and more.

The issue here isn't HSUS. The issue is large corporations and our government working together to eliminate the "family farm", making the animals nothing less than fodder for their profit margin.

I appreciate that you are in Nebraska - and I appreciate that you may live a farming lifestyle. But knowing that - I'd expect that you above anyone would recognize what the Monsantos and Cargills of the world are doing to actual family farms. They are not farmers.

I hope your next editorial focuses on the issues that are directly affecting your farms and you blame the organizations actually responsible for the changes in the American farm scene. Not the peripheral organizations who are trying to prevent this massive corporations from running roughshod over American traditions.

Anonymous
Thu Jan 26 2012 11:15
If you have read anything about HSUS you would know that they are promoting anti-agriculture not pro-conversion. HSUS wants to abolish any and every form of animal agriculture, now that doesn't sound like conversion to me. They are promoting a vegan lifestyle which is nearly impossible considering animal products are in everything from the shampoo you use, to makeup and even your toothbrush. Very good article Melissa.
Anonymous
Thu Jan 26 2012 11:11
VERY Well Said .






log out