College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

CITTA: SC governor’s disappearance proves shameful

By Kyle Citta

Print this article

Published: Sunday, June 28, 2009

Updated: Sunday, June 28, 2009

To the beloved Governor Mark Sanford:

You have given us all quite a fright in the last few days. First you become mired in a bitter battle with the South Carolina State Legislature over the allocation of federal stimulus funds. Then you disappear without notifying friends, family or staff about your whereabouts. Finally, you emerge from a last-minute trip you made to Argentina.

Either you’ve been watching too many soap operas, or some very serious stuff has been going on. Whatever the case, over the last week and a half, you have thoroughly blown my mind.

It didn’t bother me that you left without calling. It didn’t bother me that you left without clearly handing over your powers to an interim authority. What bothered me is that you left over Father’s Day without saying anything to your children.

Was that paisley tie that you knew your kids had gotten for you enough to send you over the edge? I know that you really wanted the Pooh Bear tie instead.

To further add to my irritation, your staff proved to be of no help. Amid the constant inquiries and speculation, your staff offered nothing but false information and strategically planned doublespeak. Ultimately, they didn’t even know enough to know that they knew nothing.

So I searched for you, Governor; I searched high and low. Over mountains, through the valleys, to the amber waves of grain. Your staff said to look in the Appalachian Trail; your wife said that you needed some time away from the kids to write. I thought your arbitrary absence was just a self-repressed need to explore the inner depths of your heart and soul in solitude, away from those meddling kids.

Thus, I chalked the whole thing up to a post mid-life crisis. Your Jimmy Hoffa act was really just a Henry David Thoreau thing. You hadn’t been chopped up and run through a meat grinder by conniving mob dons, you were writing your “Walden.” You were just going out, into the wild, and giving the whole Chris McCandless method the college try.

Granted, Chris McCandless may not be the best parallel. He died after all.

But your staff led everyone astray. You weren’t really hiking the Appalachian Trail, unless that trail happens to extend down to Argentina. And you weren’t really writing anything either. Although, one could say that you were dipping your pen in some ink.

The real story, as it turns out, was that you had gone to Buenos Aires to meet with a woman with whom you were having an extramarital affair. Although I do not condone such actions, I must admit that you’ve conducted your own affair much more skillfully than other politicians. You chose someone who lived outside the country, and you stayed away from Minneapolis bathroom stalls.

Unfortunately, the praise ends there.

Your sudden departure has done irrevocable damage to your party and your future career. Without adequately defining a surrogate that could assume a power transfer in your absence, critical day-to-day business of the state was left in a state of confusion. Law enforcement agencies as well as the national guard of your state were left without a clear authority to report to.

The result kick-started a real-life game of “Where’s Waldo,” but instead of searching for a twenty-something pedophile living in his parent’s basement with an affinity for coke bottle glasses and red and white striped sweaters, we were searching for the governor of a U.S. state.

And so you have returned with the real story of sex, lies and – God help us – no videotape. You have returned to a public that is upset and confused about the elaborate charade you felt was necessary to veil your deception. You have returned from an extended disappearance in Argentina to admit your mistake, which, I guess, makes you a modern day Desaparecido.

For anyone who actually understood that joke, bravo.

Throughout this whole ordeal you’ve put me through, governor, I have just one thing to ask. Why did you lie? Why did you feel that it was necessary to tell everyone that you had left because of conflicts with the Legislature? Why did you tell everyone that you had just gone for a drive on the Argentinean coast?

All right, I’ll concede the last question as half truth. You did do some driving after all.

But what compels people in positions of authority such as yourself to lie to the public you represent? There shouldn’t be any fear of damaging our sensibilities; your indiscretions are nothing new to the realm of politics. You shouldn’t fear the waves of embarrassment that ensue; your position practically mandates it.

What you should have done, Governor Sanford, is admit to your mistake and move on. These last few weeks have tested my patience and my sanity. I fretted over how you had disappeared completely, left me in limbo while I tried to remain optimistic, hoping that everything was in its right place.

But now, with all these aspects coming to light, I fear that our relationship has reached an impossible impasse.

So I’m sorry Governor Sanford, but I’m breaking up with you.

Kyle Citta is a junior English, history, pre-med, pre-law major. Reach him at kylecitta@dailynebraskan.com
 

Comments

28 comments
Your name
Sat Jul 4 2009 13:11
I Am the Flag of the
United States
Of America

I am the flag of the United States of America.
My name is Old Glory.
I fly atop the world's tallest buildings.
I stand watch in America's halls of justice.
I fly majestically over institutions of learning.
I stand guard with power in the world.
Look up and see me.

I stand for peace, honor, truth and justice.
I stand for freedom.
I am confident.
I am arrogant.
I am proud.
When I am flown with my fellow banners,
My head is a little higher,
My colors a little truer.
I bow to no one!
I am recognized all over the world.
I am worshipped - I am saluted.
I am loved - I am revered.
I am respected - and I am feared.
I have fought in every battle of every war for more then 200 years. I was flown at Valley Forge, Gettysburg, Shiloh and Appomattox.
I was there at San Juan Hill, the trenches of France,
in the Argonne Forest, Anzio, Rome and the beaches of Normandy.
Guam, Okinawa, Korea and KheSan, Saigon, Vietnam know me.
I'm presently in the mountains of Afganistan and the hot and dusty deserts of Iraq and wherever freedom is needed.
I led my troops, I was dirty, battleworn and tired,
But my soldiers cheered me and I was proud.
I have been burned, torn and trampled on the streets of countries I have helped set free.
It does not hurt for I am invincible.
I have been soiled upon, burned, torn and trampled in the streets of my country.
And when it's done by those Whom I've served in battle - it hurts.
But I shall overcome - for I am strong.
I have slipped the bonds of Earth and stood watch over the uncharted frontiers of space from my vantage point on the moon.
I have borne silent witness to all of America's finest hours.
But my finest hours are yet to come.
When I am torn into strips and used as bandages for my wounded comrades on the battlefield,
When I am flown at half-mast to honor my soldier,
Or when I lie in the trembling arms of a grieving parent
at the grave of their fallen son or daughter,

I am proud.
Don't Cry for me Argentina
Sat Jul 4 2009 12:01
Kyle I thought Desaparecidos were either a short lived band from Omaha or more significantly a term for people who were brutally kidnapped and probably killed by the Argentine junta in the 1970s and 80s. Not much humor in that though I suppose humor is a matter of perspective. I imagine some people found Charles Manson to be a laugh riot.

Anyway don't give up on your "beloved" Gov. Sanford I sure he'll soon tire of that Argentine slut and come back into your loving arms.

By the way. Isn't Kylecitta Spanish for village idiot?

Don't cry for me Governor Sanford
Sat Jul 4 2009 00:44
Don't cry Kyle. I'm sure Governor Sanford is just going through a phase and soon he'll come back to you with a nice bouquet of roses and a box of chocolates. That is what girls like isn't it?
Yo!
Fri Jul 3 2009 17:17
Kyle Citta wants people to know he's not just any old ordinary junior. He's a pre-med and pre-law junior. During his four years in La La Land, he wants to bask in the glory of something he'll never do. He won't have the motivation, especially since he is already taking credit for it, in a way. Besides, instructors in those schools won't praise him for spewing stream-of-consiousness drivel on their exams. He's probably got the idea, like a lot of undergrads in weak disciplines like English, that he ought to get A's just for wiping his ampersand. In the end we can always use people who are able to stock shelves at night.
YN
Fri Jul 3 2009 16:33
Without even reading this "article," I already know the gist. Here is the obvious response to such "emotion as thinking": If candidate X says, "Don't rob banks," and many people agree with him that that is the right way to live our private lives, it is pure stupidity to "think" anything changes if X then goes and robs a bank. It's still wrong to rob banks, and X still said the right thing when he advocated against robbing banks. It would be a bonus if X had his act together, but nothing he does or doesn't do changes the truth.
I beg to differ
Fri Jul 3 2009 11:21
I was a little pressed for time so I thought I'd add these remarks:

Justin in the first place I don't think Republicans or conservatives, or the boogyman for that matter, had much to do with making the term liberal a dirty word. People like you are solely responable.

Also about the Gallop Poll. It finds that 40% of Americans identify with being Conservative 35% consider themselves moderate and a woping 21% consider themselves liberal.

Also on November shortly before the election Zogby picked Obama to win by 11 points. He would have had to be as big a idiot as you are to pick it any other way

Nor do all polls indicate this favoritism for single payer health care that you claim. The Rasmussen Poll taken May 18, 2009 states that 42% of Americans favor "free" health care while 44% are opposed. Also 60% reject free health care if it means changing their coverage and joining a government plan. Also 70% of Americans believe their present insurance is good or excellent and 53% believe their coverage would be worse under a government plan.

For your polling considering how Americans are going more liberal. Besides being dishonestly selective it also suffers from the problem that you don't state what polls you got your information from. Nor do you mention what representative population was used in your polls. If I was to poll a bunch of lefty socialists like yourself I would be sure to get a majority in favor of a single payer health insurance plan. By the way were the pollers even sure that those asked knew what single payer is? We also have no indication of weither the questions were leading questions or if the response would be diferent if those polled were asked if they favored socialized medince. This is a major flaw in all your survey claims along with the selective nature and the failure to not that many of these issues show a high level of media manipulation towards a certain perspective in regards to the issue.

As for more Banking regulation I Whats that mean? That Obama should nationalize our banks?

Do something about global warming? I'd like to do something about global warming I'd like more of it in the winter and less of it in the summer but that doesn't mean I caused it or that I can do anything about it.

Pulling troops out of Iraq? Even Bush was in favor of doing that.

This also leads to a another problem I have with your polling logic for say:
Would most Americans favor single payer medical care if it meant medical rationing, the loss of their freedom to chose a physician a end to new drug research as presently employed, a reduction in the quality of medical care, massive deficit spending, long waits for vital medical treatments and or operations and the prospect of millions that are still uninsured?
Furthermore if Americans have been duped into the leftist hoax of global warming and they have stated that "something must be done about it" would they favor a Cap n Trade initiative with massive increases in utility costs that would be burdened mostly by the poorest, the loss of millions of jobs and a crippled economy resulting in a greater government strangle hold on the economy and big profits for Democrat fat cat supporters?

What would be their view on banking regulation if they realized that the cause of the present banking crisis was a lax mortgage market where government pressure to provide mortgages to everyone and a desire by certain members of such government, many of who were democrats, to ignore a out of control mortgage market and also profit from it led to the present collapse?

You display the use of polling at its worse: As an instrument of demagoguery designed to manipulate public opinion through deception, distortion and misinformation as a means to bend and shape public support for corrupt and unwise policies.

I think you shot your mouth off about this Americans going liberal stuff. You realized you can't support your claims and you are trying to hide your failure with deceit and distortion. Maybe you should see if you can get a job with the Obama administration. They could use someone like you.

Your name
Fri Jul 3 2009 00:53
Justin that Gallop Poll stated that Conservatives were the majority among those polled if you bothered to mention it those identified with liberals polled at a significantly lower number. Awful dishonest of you. Ya I think Zogby polled McCain as ahead of other Republican candidates in the primaries. I didn't know that Americans wanting out of Iraq made them liberal. I think that means they want peace. I dispute your other poll claims. Frankly they are your dishonest interpretations of poorly asked questions. Americans do not favor single payer insurance, dispute the validity of global warming. I think they are your attempt at claiming you represent a majority which you don't. They also display a misunderstanding of what political ideology is. Basically you take a statement and response that seems to resemble your views in some remote way and claim that it suports your view.

What makes you think liberal ideas are working? If you define liberalism as the Obama administration that you surely must agree that liberalism doesn't work is filled with incompetence and corruption and is heading down the road to extinction. To paraphrase your quote Liberalism is not on the rise; it's a movement whose time has long passed. Liberal governance has been revealed to be nothing more than corruption and incompetence. In the meantime, liberal ideas is failing.

andrew dickinson
Fri Jul 3 2009 00:41
Justin, Obama won the election by winning over independent voters. During the campaign he portrayed himself as far more conservative than he truly is. If you look at it in that light, it actually contradicts your statement. Since he has recently started pushing forward massive energy and health care bills with extremely large price tags that cannot be hidden from the public, his approval rating has entered a steady decline. Massive government expansion, control and spending are all liberal ideals. So, if his approval rating has started to decline as it becomes more obvious that he truly is farther left than any president we have had, wouldn't that mean that Americans are realizing he's more of a liberal than they thought and are now changing their views of him?
I beg to differ
Thu Jul 2 2009 22:52
To quote Justin in his cowardly failure to address my remarks when I told him that he doesn't define liberalism or conservatism.

"Frankly, if you don't already know what these words mean, you shouldn't be talking about politics."

I'm asking you Justin: DO YOU KNOW WHAT THEY MEAN? INFORM ME. I don't think you have the foggiest idea what they mean. They are just terms you banter about as a form of hate speech for you to sputter and spew. So tell me what do they mean because unless we understand the terms we do not have a debate just a shouting match between the ignorant. Perhaps thats what you want. I don't think you want a legitimate debate and genuine argument because others would wipe the floor with your sorry ignorant behind. You hatefuly bandy about words Whose meanings are clouded by your overwrought emotionally hateful ignorance. Stop using words you don't understand. It only make you look foolish.
We've already disproven your moronic assertion about the political slant of the American People. Its easy to disprove your silly claims because unlike you we know what we are talking about. We are motivated by love of country and honor not bigotry and hatred like you.

Enough already!!!!
Thu Jul 2 2009 22:31
When you go to Washington do you know the difference between a Democrat and a Republican? There isn't any. Both of them want an increasingly larger federal government with more programs and more control over your life. A nation made by Washington, For Washington. All you people who fight over being a Republican or a Democrat. Your just useful idiots. The power brokers in Washington love it. They love you fighting and squabbling while they take over your life. Its divide and conquer. Why do you think they encourage multiculturalism? Its so they can better control us. Emphasis the diferences encourage the hate. Make US forget we are one people, E Pluribus Unium. They want us to be divided, divided into little tribes, fighting each other so they can rule. Enough already. We have more in common with each other than we are lead to realize. All we need to do is think about it. On the anniversary of our Independence we need to remember we are all Americans. In 1776 Americans forgot their differences and united against a common enemy, a government that sought to violate the natural rules of law and rule through tyranny. Today we have a Washington establishment that seeks to do the same. If our forefathers felt it more necessary to fight over petty trifles or selfish egos we'd still be British and possibly slaves. If we don't unite today and defend the freedoms establish on that long ago date we will indeed be slaves.
I don't care if you are a democrat or a republican, liberal or conservative you are an American for crying out loud!!!!!! Start acting like Americans not a bunch of fools. This was a nation built by adults not babies. Even children know how to work together why can't, you who claim to be adults, do any better? Grow up, unite and work for freedom or fight like children and always be enslaved.

The choice is yours

I pray that God will open your eyes and save the U.S.A

Andrew Lacy
Thu Jul 2 2009 21:37
The sad thing is that Justin is one of the more influential morons currently serving in ASUN.

The George Washington University Battleground Poll is the most universally respected polling service in politics, comprised of a joint effort between both Republican and Democrat pollsters. Every poll they take includes question D3: "When thinking about politics and government, do you consider yourself to be a) very conservative, b) somewhat conservative c) moderate d)somewhat liberal e) very liberal f) unsure/refused.

The percentage of people who self identify as conservative: 59% (Sept. 2002) 59% (Sept. 2003) 61% (April 2004) 59% (June 2004) 60% (Sept. 2004) 61% (Oct. 2005) 59% (Mar. 2006) 61% (Oct. 2006) 59% (Jan. 2007) 63% (July 2007) 58% (Dec. 2007) 63% (May 2008) 60% (Aug. 2008). When the numbers are that consistent, there's no room for doubt that this is a center-right country. McCain lost to Obama not because of any merit of Obama's, but because McCain was Democrat-lite and the conservative base didn't want him. The Democrats are in for a rude awakening when the country starts to feel the unintended consequences of Obama's war on prosperity.

Justin
Thu Jul 2 2009 18:07
"since you A. don't define liberalism or conservatism, "

Frankly, if you don't already know what these words mean, you shouldn't be talking about politics.

Justin
Thu Jul 2 2009 17:58
"John Zogby states that that the 2008 election was not a liberal victory or a a liberal mandate." Maybe, but John Zogby is an idiot and an incompetent poller. Didn't all the Zogby polls show a huge McCain victory? And in the Gallop poll you refer to, only about 40% of Americans actually call themselves "conservative" - not a majority.

And in the meantime, a majority of Americans want us out of Iraq, a majority of Americans favor a single-payer health care system, like in Canada and Europe, a majority of Americans was stronger regulation of banks and businesses, a majority of Americans want stronger action on global warming, so on and so forth. While it's never been the case that a majority of Americans will call themselves "liberal" - since Republicans succeeded in making that a curse word - it's always been true that a large majority of Americans actually are liberal on the issues.

Conservativsm is not on the rise; it's a movement whose time has long passed. Conservative governance has been revealed to be nothing more than corruption and incompetence. In the meantime, liberal ideas are working.

I beg to differ again
Thu Jul 2 2009 17:44
Besides whats this survey crap? The most recent Gallop Poll shows a majority of Americans are Conservatives. John Zogby states that that the 2008 election was not a liberal victory or a a liberal mandate. The Pew Research Center states that political values and core attitudes since 1987 show little ideological movement.

Excuse me, but don't all these people do surveys? And what are there findings? That conservatism is on the rise. That Little Barry is showing America the true ugliness of liberalism.

I beg to differ
Thu Jul 2 2009 17:19
Obama winning the election doesn't prove most Americans are Conservative it just proves that more voters voted for Obama than McCain. You do realize that a large number of Americans didn't vote because McCain was basically a watered down Omama and that many conservatives failed to vote at all. Pretty flawed logic there. I thought you'd use it though since it makes sense to you, if not to anyone else. I also doubt the validity of your surveys since you A. don't define liberalism or conservatism, (you never do) B. the result of such polls depend on what people are asked and who the people are that are asked. C. Many polls are rigged with questionable procedures. I find it usual for you to claim that all polls indicate most Americans are liberal (a term you never define) Of coarse you don't mention which polls these are so If I challenge you to name these polls you will make a mad race to your leftist oriented blogs and find examples of two or three that support your hair-brained scheme or you will take one or two questions from a reliable poll that support your erroneous assumption while ignoring the result of other questions and proclaim: See I have proof, hoping that I will be either gullible enough, out of town, dead, or just to lazy to shoot your nonsensical facility full of holes. If any of these events happen you will proclaim victory since, to you, winning arguments is more important than being right; something you have little or no expedience with.
I do appreciate you equating Obama's victory to liberalism since in your own inept way you have managed to imply that liberals are at one with Obama: a ultra radical left wing extremist dedicated to the destruction on America in his narcissistic pursuit of personal power who possesses an overriding desire to create a nation of slaves totally dependent on government. If I'd said that you would have had a conniption fit and done what all lefties do when faced with having to argue facts: have an emotional seizure combined with a tourettical spew of name calling.
As for your depiction of conservatives as rural hayseeds it reminds me of Obama's "bitter clingers" rendition at his fat cat fundraiser in California. I guess when it comes to bigotry, hatred, and ignorance you two have alot in common
Justin
Thu Jul 2 2009 01:09
""Most Americans are liberals" NO THEY"RE NOT!!!!! And you fully know that."

No, it's true. I realize you'd never know it living in Nebraska, but in survey after survey a majority of Americans take liberal positions on every political issue. Rural Americans are pretty much the only mostly conservative group, but only one in five Americans live rurally. Survey after survey. You know, Obama did just win an election; how do you think that happened, exactly? Never mind, I'm sure you've got some hilarious conspiracy theory.

Andrew
Wed Jul 1 2009 23:50
It amazes me how some people live and die by their political views. What Governor Sanford did has nothing to do with the fact that he is a Republican, it has to do with the type of human being he is.
I beg to differ
Wed Jul 1 2009 22:49
"Most Americans are liberals" NO THEY"RE NOT!!!!! And you fully know that.
enough already
Wed Jul 1 2009 22:47
No, I mean quit this comic book black and white view of the world as divided into two parties where the one you feel identity with is the white party and the other which you associate all the evil with is the black party. (color symbology can be transposed for taste) Quit being a slave to orthodoxy and become a free thinker and recognize that we are all Americans.
the real scandal
Wed Jul 1 2009 21:06
Who cares if this politician had an affair with an mistress or that one was caught with a prostitute. Barack Obama's raping the whole country. Now that's a scandal