Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

CITTA: Liberal professors don’t make left-leaning students

Published: Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Updated: Thursday, February 26, 2009 02:02

I thank our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, every day for Bob Jones University. 

Hyper-conservative institutions of higher education like ol' BJ University ensure that today's youth aren't poisoned by the liberal minds of their instructors. Because clearly, the goal of the modern university is to provide a backhanded, Pinko-commie indoctrination of its students. 

Through a steady stream of liberal professors and administrators, the communist mindset will creep its way back into the apple pies and the stars and stripes of America.

And, of course, the USSR will rise again. 

Obviously the idea that colleges are a festering cesspool for liberal indoctrination is completely ridiculous. And the only credit Bob Jones should get is for providing a punch line for any academia related joke. 

That doesn't mean that universities aren't filled with liberal professors; they are. But attending college doesn't pull you to one side of the fence, just like living in Nebraska doesn't automatically make you cream for corn. 

The issue is slightly more multi-faceted than the screaming majority of conservative critics would have you believe. 

A study released in last year's PS: Political Science and Politics journal researched what effect the ideology of an instructor had on their student's beliefs. The study looked at 7,000 students in 38 institutions. 

There was no evidence to suggest that a professor's personal views directly impacted or changed the views of their students. The study in PS is one of three that has reached this conclusion. 

So, as flattering as it is for some parents to worry about the persuasiveness of their kids' potential educators, it might be best to hold off on that tuition payment to Grove City College. 

But let's make one thing very clear: Universities do have a disproportionate number of liberal instructors. A 2007-2008 study in the Chronicle of Higher Education found that 43 percent of full-time faculty classified themselves as "liberal," and 8 percent called themselves "far left." When looking at only public universities, the number of liberal professors jumps to 59 percent. 

College professors did contribute to the Obama campaign this election season in staggering numbers. Data from the Center for Responsive Politics shows that professors and administrators in universities put $12.2 million into the hands of the Illinois senator. 

Only $1.5 million of this same group went to the McCain camp. 

Just because an instructor is liberal doesn't mean they're indoctrinating the youth. That myth is just a baseless conservative charge that tries to rationalize why so many college-aged kids happen to prefer the left to the right, and why, when it comes to politics and youth, it's best to apply a "left-hand rule." 

Jeremy D. Mayer, the co-author of the book "Closed Minds? Politics and Ideology in American Universities" weighed in on the issue, saying that parents and family are the most important influences on a student's life, followed by the news media and peers. 

"Professors are among the least influential," Mayer said. "It is really hard to change the mind of anyone over 15." 

Loud and incessant conservatives still try to make the issue into something it's not. David Horowitz of the Horowitz Freedom Center has been on a liberal professor witch hunt for years. His mission statement is to end a "curricula of radicalism that tenured leftists are imposing on our students under the pretext of providing them with an education." 

His center has a complaint list that targets "radical" instructors. A few glances over the complaints illustrate a different story. Many don't provide a class where the complaint arose from and many more are anonymous. They all give a personal anecdote from a disgruntled student that reads more like a vendetta letter than an actual complaint. 

But why do college students align more to the left? An age-old argument goes something like this: College-aged kids don't work, pay taxes or have families – and thus, we don't have the life experiences to understand the "real" world. 

This argument basically reads like: "We know you're in college, and we think that's adorable. But you need to shut up while the grown-ups handle things." 

At the risk of sounding arrogant (but I'll say it anyway because that argument is as conceited as it gets), let me make a new argument: 

"Why don't you shut up and let the better educated people handle things?" 

A Pew Research Center study found that liberals were the highest educated group of all the groups it surveyed. 49 percent were college grads and 26 percent had post-graduate education. The study found a positive correlation between education and liberal ideology. 

There's this adage that goes: "If you're not a liberal at 20 you have no heart; if you're not a conservative at 40 you have no brain." But this research suggests that liberals at 40 are statistically the ones with more brains. 

The nature of our education and not the views of our instructors, is what makes us liberal. Our education forces us to examine all sides of an issue and determine which side has the best supporting evidence. It has absolutely nothing to do with who teaches us. 

It's disgusting that conservatives don't give college students enough credit to think for themselves. As if every student is an automaton that will do whatever someone programs them for without a second thought. That's not the case; we just have a strong educational background that emphasizes critical approaches to issues. 

And a lot of us are liberal. Deal with it.

Kyle Citta is a junior pre-med, english, and history major. reach him at kylecitta@dailynebraskan.com.

 

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

39 comments

Your name
Mon May 4 2009 22:21
Same with the history professors but I imagine Citta already knows that
Your name
Mon May 4 2009 17:20
You should tell this to the English Professors cause they are always talking about their liberal viewpoints
Rex the Wonder horse
Mon May 4 2009 14:30
Ripping Citta's like outwitting a baby: Its fun, easy, and it makes you feel so darn smart.
Bill Buckley
Mon May 4 2009 13:29
Citta sites a Pew Research study that indicates that 49% of the college grads and 26% of the graduated students were liberals. He states that this is proof that liberals are better educated. What about the 51% of the graduates and 74% of the grad students who weren't liberals? I guess math is not one of his strong suits.

I also noticed that there were a far lower number of grad students who were liberals. This high number of liberal undergraduates is possibly due to the fact that many of them are still possess of the last vestiges of developing teen age brains. It is well known that the teen age brain is subject to impulsiveness, emotionalism and an inability to make sound rational decisions; traits shared by most liberals and especially shown by Kyle Citta. The lower level of liberalism among grad students is indicative of the fact that liberals at 20 are not so much possessed of a heart as lacking in sense. While conservativism is the product of mature reflection, logic, common sense, and the lessons of life's learning; thus proving that conservatives do have brains or at least much higher intelligence.

It would seem if we follow Citta' argument to its illogical conclusion the major purpose of colleges obviously is not because college students are there to learn since, according to Citta, professors have no influence over their students who are incapable of learning anything any way since they are older than 15 and ,accordingly to Citta, you can't tell anyone anything after they are 15. So apparently the purpose of colleges is to marginalize young liberals until they are old enough to learn what a bunch of BS liberal ideology is.

I hope Kyle Citta stays in school a long time.

More Citta bunk
Mon May 4 2009 11:07
A. Citta never defines what a conservative or a liberal is therefore his entire column is meaningless.

B. If professors have so little meaning in students lives then why do students waste their time going to school and why do professors waste their time and the communities resources gasbaging away?

I so few professors call themselves liberal than why did so many of them chose to contribute to Obama, a liberal, (as in the definition of a big government politician)? Perhaps they aren't so honest about their views.

Surveys have also found that the best informed and most charitable of the populace are conservatives (those who believe in limited government and higher personal freedom). "Highest educated" is a meaningless term much like Citta is a meaningless columnist

Bea
Mon May 4 2009 09:30
Conservative, Libertarian, Liberal. Labels. In my youth, I thought of conservatives as stiff suits wanting to hold everyone down. I grew up. I got over myself. Ha. The joke is on everyone that will not grow up, but they will take us all down. FREEDOM...LIBERTY....once those are gone, we will not get it back. Look closely at WHO GIVES THE MOST. Look closely at who is the most wealthy, but gives so very little compared to conservatives. Conservatism only means that a person believes in personal freedoms, personal abilities, the God given freedoms that any living, breathing, moving creature should enjoy. Thanks for nothing, you folks that see a conservative as heartless. That would be those of you who have voted in the party that will bring this once free nation down to the level of those that see no freedom. Why? Those very wealthy people don't believe in the lesser class having what they have. As it was, ANYONE could become as wealthy, and many have. But, in this country there has grown a political elite that debate well, but have not one bit of deep down bit of heart for the struggles of WE THE PEOPLE. They have only disdain for the very document that has kept this nation free for over 200 years. They believe it should "change" with the times. You know, any Saddam, Fidel, or Ozero that comes along? Did any of you know that there is an attempt to REMOVE term limits. WooFlippinHoo... Grow up. VIVA LIBERTY!
Your name
Wed Mar 11 2009 22:20
This fellow college student has to wonder if the author has ever taken a history or similar social class, and whether or not the author has ever listened a professor with even mild political views describe past events in an environment in which their word is the student's grade.

Furthermore, a professor can make quite an impression on a person who has little depth of knowledge on the topic being discussed. Do students really question these accounts of their professors? I have yet to see it happen once in my four years. Nearly every student leaves a lecture feeling 'enlightened', not questioning what other points of view there could be to it.
(Especially not if the student tends to have a liberal political view already, since they feel ideologically 'safe' in a university setting, where the biases they will encounter are more likely to mesh with their own than not.)

Professors' political views can make a big impression. Get your head out of your butt.

swamp fox
Wed Mar 4 2009 11:16
"n/a" is projecting.
Your name
Tue Mar 3 2009 13:15
Dallas: don't worry. It's really a DN columnist. He's a pro.
Dizzy in Dallas
Tue Mar 3 2009 13:10
n/a: if you're trying to impress anyone, it isn't working. This sounds like the incoherent ravings of a lunatic.
n/a
Tue Mar 3 2009 12:55
In their conspiracy theories, conservatives are telling more about themselves than about liberals. Only a victim or purveyor of indoctrination veiled as education would assume any education to be inherently indoctrinated.

From birth, an overwhelming majority of conservatives (myself included) are fed into a secluded (ideologically, not necessarily geographically) system where they are first the victim and then the purveyor of indoctrination. Those whose livelihood or sense of well-being are rooted in such systems of ignorance have reason to worry, because when a newly-molded individual's entire world-view is based upon self-contradicting, irrational, and/or hypocritical philosophies fed from above, objective logic and reasoning are powerfully destructive forces to enact upon such a tenuous hold on power over that individual. Every closed society's greatest enemy is the uncensored flow of knowledge, and conservative communities are no different.

College students are not usually challenged in this way for the first few semesters. For the next couple years after that, they can escape from reality by using right-wing conspiracy theories (and Fox news) as cover. If a fully-indoctrinated youth attends college for only four years and is equipped with the defensive "they're out to get me" mindset, he/she has an amazingly high chance of escaping with most of his/her unfounded beliefs intact. These beliefs are then left to cement over the rest of his/her life, as they will never again be tested in their cloistered communities.

With the likes of Fox News, the secluded community is capable of traveling with the individual, as a virtual shield against reason. Now, conservative individuals no longer have to return to their secluded communities if they want to retain their outdated values. Conservative talk radio and television shows have brought the closed society, encapsulated by the individual, to the workplace and the university. Any discomforting facts can be washed away with the proper amount of self-reinforcing rhetoric from a friendly ideologue at the end of the day.

Biff
Tue Mar 3 2009 12:11
Absent was any mention of a procedure for secession, other than maybe the amendment process. (Chet, it's even more fun to toss unsupported accusations at those you disagree with.)
Biff
Tue Mar 3 2009 12:05
The final integration of all that had been written on the subject was embodied in the ratified Constitution itself, which contained such things as the Supremacy Clause.
Biff
Tue Mar 3 2009 12:04
Before anyone points out I didn't get to the federalist issue: American federalism, fortunately, was well documented.
Chet
Tue Mar 3 2009 11:37
Revisionist history is fun.
Biff
Tue Mar 3 2009 11:30
Aaron: since I said (wrote) nothing at all, but merely quoted Lincoln, you are arguing with Lincoln. One of the quotes reveals just how distressed Lincoln felt at people just like you (apparently) trying to pigeon-hole him according to what suited their agendas. However, Natural Law is atavistically conservative, particularly within a civilization which embraced at least latent Christian precepts regarding universal equality and which has served as a roadmap for progress. "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus." Gal. 3:28 The founders' used aspirational language reflecting an underlying recognition of universal equality (". . . that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty . . . .") Lincoln found himself in a situation that forced him to throw off the shackles of hypocrisy and put that aspirational language into action. Conservatives are not for the status quo per se. But they are for a particular kind of change, not change for change's sake.
Biff
Tue Mar 3 2009 11:20
Natural Law also predates the Constitution, and those rights which the Constitution does not extinguish must necessarily survive its ratification. This would include freedom from involuntary servitude, although post-Civil War America found it necessary to codify that freedom in the 13th Amendment. However, most historians will tell you this result was inevitable. Lincoln simply found himself in a position where wartime necessity made its acceleration irresistible.
Biff
Tue Mar 3 2009 10:27
I'll try to post later. This thing is kicking out all my posts, probably except this one since it's just another test.
Biff Boy
Tue Mar 3 2009 10:20
Lincoln's great achievement was preserving this theoretical structure so that it could survive to function as a reality. He preserved the Republican form of governance so that it would not "perish from the earth." This is was the meridian of 19th century conservatism.
Your name
Tue Mar 3 2009 10:00
add






log out