Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

CITTA: Church reinstates antiquated, risky indulgences

Published: Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 21:02

I had intended to write an optimistic column this week. Instead of finding faults in current issues, I wanted to focus on something beautiful, elegant and profound.
But, as usual, humanity never fails to disappoint.

Catholic dioceses around the world have brought something back – and unfortunately, it's not sexy. Indulgences are making a resurgence as the quickest way to get into heaven. No frills and no questions, just a little blind faith.

Before I embark upon this latest diatribe, a little explaining is in order. Part of Catholic doctrine states that in order for a person to enter heaven, many will have to spend a little time in purgatory first. Purgatory works off your sins until your soul has been scrubbed free of all the bad stuff.

The Catholic Church has always looked for ways to make a quick buck. And exploiting people's fear of spending a hell of a long time in purgatory offered an enticing proposition. Indulgences became a commodity that anyone could buy that would supposedly knock off a few years that they would have spent in purgatory.

The revenue from indulgences went to a variety of pet projects for the Church. Inevitably, corruption leaked into the practice, forming the basis for Martin Luther's 95 theses and eventually, the Protestant schism.

You know, all that stuff you learned in Western Civ class.

Fast forward through a few pissed off Germans, some excommunications and hundreds of years of animosity and you get to the Second Vatican Council in 1962. Vatican II made some stark changes to Catholic doctrine, and indulgences were all but erased.

But according to a Feb. 10 New York Times article, indulgences are back and just as big of a rip off as before. Rest assured, the sins you've committed are easy to bypass with just a few good deeds and the blessings of the Church.

To the credit of the Catholics, they're not actually selling indulgences this time around. Instead, you earn them through regular confession coupled with good deeds. I'm all for people acting like better human beings, but do we really need indulgences to accomplish this?

According to the New York Times article, the vast majority of practicing Catholics had absolutely no clue what an indulgence even was. Some understood the concept but were unaware that dioceses brought it back. But after some quick education, a few are now excited at the prospects, like Octavia Andrade from Queens:

"Anything old coming back, I'm in favor of it. More fervor is a good thing."

If Andrade automatically equates old with good then I'm sure she would love for the Catholic Church to put the mass back into Latin. She'd be excited to sit through the service with her priest's back turned toward her. She must have a strong desire to revisit the Friday fasting rituals long abandoned by the actions of Vatican II.

After all, old is good.

Why has the Catholic Church brought indulgences back? Is there so much sin in this world that a Catholic "get out of jail free" card has become necessary? Are people gullible enough to clamor for a bill of sale for time off in the afterlife?

As Gob Bluth of Arrested Development would say: Come on!

Indulgences won't wipe sin off this earth, they'll only provide people with false hope. And without a signature from the Big Guy upstairs on one of these things, I'm not convinced that they'll really do as the Church promises.

The character of your soul should determine your passage into heaven, not the word of a piece of paper.

Indulgences brought the Catholic Church to the breaking point and forever altered the course of Christianity. They corrupted the most powerful figures of this religion and ushered in the most radical ideas concerning doctrine. They tore the fabric of tradition in favor of active Christian philosophy.

Will someone explain why we are opening up Pandora's Box again? Why bring this outdated and exhausted concept back from the dead? Do contemporary Catholics really believe that going to confession once a year and helping their neighbor take out the garbage is enough to shed a few years off their time in purgatory? I'll give them a little more credit than that.

I'm certainly no fan of Protestantism, nor am I a Christian, but "buying" your way into heaven is contrary to what being a Christian should be about. Buying into this crap is a risky proposition, one that's best left untouched. Stick with the Hail Marys instead.

But if you're still not convinced that indulgences are better used as toilet paper than proof of salvation, then get one for your significant other for Valentine's Day. Nothing says "I love you" more than a couple years off of the blistering pain and torture of damnation in purgatory.

Kyle Citta is a Junior English, History and pre-med major. Reach him at kylecitta@dailynebraskan.com.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

45 comments

Scott Wood
Fri Feb 27 2009 16:14
I declare a personal Thunderdome against Kyle Citta.

Two men (used loosely in Kyle's case) enter, I leave.

FAIL
Thu Feb 26 2009 13:48
While Kyle has every right to "stir the pot" and likely relishes being Mr. Provocateur, he ought to be concerned about his credibility at this point.

Almost no one takes him seriously.

Lynne Flatley
Wed Feb 18 2009 18:19
A few points...

1. If you were Catholic, you'd know indulgences never went away.
2. Indulgences are not bought or paid for, i.e. no money changes hands. They are lovely devotional practices.
3. The requirement of going to confession once a year is NOT an indulgence. It is a requirement. We're all sinners. If someone has gone a fully year without going to confession, I suspect they did not do a thorough examination of conscience each day.

MarinaMarina
Wed Feb 18 2009 00:24
"I’m sure she would love for the Catholic Church to put the mass back into Latin. She’d be excited to sit through the service with her priest’s back turned toward her. She must have a strong desire to revisit the Friday fasting rituals long abandoned by the actions of Vatican II." That's what I'm talkin' about! I go to the Latin where where I pray /with/ the priest /to/ God AND ... *gasp* I don't eat meat on Fridays. Maybe that sacrifice won't get me out of any Purgatory time, but it's not hurting anyone is it? Getting out of Purgatory isn't even my intention with sacrificing (I would be thrilled to go to Purgatory, cuz eventually you go to Heaven) it's love of God.
Against Kyle and Maryxus
Tue Feb 17 2009 15:38
Hey Maryxus - this is the deal. Kyle's opinion is uninformed, and this is why. Kyle says indulgences were abolished with Vatican II and are now being brought back; this is untrue. That isn't what we believe; it is the fact. Kyle says that you can buy indulgences; you can't, and to put a very fine point on it, you never could. This isn't what we believe; this is the fact. Kyle says that indulgences come on some kind of written piece of paper. They don't, and they never did. This isn't what we believe; this is the fact. Shall I continue, Maryxus? Because I can certainly go on. What Kyle did was write an op-ed piece without doing the slightest bit of research on his topic. For that, Maryxus, Kyle deserves to be taken to task. That is not "bashing"; it is what we Catholics call "firm correction." Perhaps next time he'll put a small bit of effort into his journalistic pretensions.
शांति
Mon Feb 16 2009 20:39
In response to Phillip [post Thu Feb 12 2009 17:43] --

I'm curious as to what you had in mind when you mentioned " "old" Muslim practices."

John M
Mon Feb 16 2009 10:45
Yeah, this Citta has a history of scribbling out his nasty, bottle-fed prejudices in a sort of free form style, like a Kindergartener with a can of fingerpaint. He is as ignorant as they come, but even ignoramuses serve a purpsoe. People can write all sorts of uninformed bigotry about the Catholic Church, without fear of getting harrassed, sued, blacklisted or threatened. Try using that tone against the homosexual community, or Islamic terrorists, and see what happens.
Mike
Mon Feb 16 2009 09:09
Citta,

You're lucky Catholics are so "indulgent" (yuck yuck) with people who attack our faith :-) All we can do is to pray for you.

Maryxus
Sun Feb 15 2009 19:13
I think what amuses me most about all of your comments is that almost all any of you are doing is just feeding off the arguments of the original comment in order to express your dismay at one person's opinion. Only a few people have actually made any comments as to what the truth (so far as they believe) of the subject is, and if you aren't willing to share what it is that you believe is correct then you have no place to speak.

All I see here is a bunch of Catholics borrowing someone else's brain to express dismay and/or outrage over having their faith challenged. Regardless of whether or not his article is correct, this is just shameful, and I hope you guys have plenty of indulgence available to cover the sin you're racking up with all this bashing.

Susie
Sun Feb 15 2009 19:02
In all seriousness, Citta, what were your sources?
Katie
Sun Feb 15 2009 16:54
Kyle,
The close-minded perspective of this article saddens me. Most of the time, simply knowing facts about spirituality is not sufficient. In order to understand spiritual truths, it takes understanding of the heart and often this type of understanding (wisdom may be an easier word to describe this?) is not able to be put into words.
I'm first of all saddened that you didn't take the time to know what indulgences were factually. They do not stand on their own but go into the context of a great deal of theological thought on freewill, sin and its consequences, confession, and God's great mercy. They are not written on slips of paper.
Secondly, I'm saddened that you wrote this article thinking your knowledge (however flawed it may have been) would be sufficient in the first place to truly understand Catholocism. It takes years of prayer and small revelations to be able to see these truths clearly. I'll be praying for you that through this experience, you will be able to grow in humility and charity.
Timothy Mulligan
Sat Feb 14 2009 09:52
Kyle, I was surprised to learn at the end of this article that you were a Junior, because you sounded much more like a Sophomore.

Our Lord gave St. Peter and his successors the power to loosen or bind sins. This includes the power to remit the punishment due for sins (even forgiven sins). The Church in its wisdom has chosen to exercise this power in return for the performance of certain acts or prayers that lead the faithful into a deeper prayer life.

The faithful, in turn, demonstrate their simple, childlike (but not childish) faith in the Church founded by Our Lord by having recourse to these indulgences.

This comes down to faith and humility, Kyle. Your character could do with these, and we are praying for you.

Joshua
Sat Feb 14 2009 03:21
Indeed, humanity never fails to disappoint...at least if you consider yourself and the editor who allowed this article to run. Opinions should rightly be voiced out, but of course a bit of homework is neccesary. At least hear two sides of the story.I'm surprised someone as educated as you claim you are did not do this. Shame on you and the editor who allowed this article!
Mike, England
Fri Feb 13 2009 20:02
Whoever wrote this is an astounding moron.
Jacob
Fri Feb 13 2009 18:00
If that article was turned in in any High School class it would get an F.
Margaret
Fri Feb 13 2009 11:57
I'm sure if nothing else the paper is enjoying it's new found popularity.......wait, what was that saying, "always look(ing) for ways to make a quick buck" Ignorance is apparently justified when money is exchanged.
Ethan
Fri Feb 13 2009 09:49
Alice, Citta just declared "pre-med" along with English (and now I guess also History) in order to have a more impressive by-line. Anyone serious about medical school has to max out academically and be focused. It's not hard to see he isn't going to do that, and probably has no intention of doing that. Flakiness like this is a tell-tale sign he doesn't have the required seriousness.
Alice
Fri Feb 13 2009 09:20
Talk about arrested development, and you're a pre-med student? Lord help us!! Please, in the future, investigate facts before you write because you are WRONG on all points. Normally I fnd it extremely offensive to be attacked in this way, but considering your total lack of knowlege (and that questions your intelligence altogether.) If I ran that College, I'd run you right out of it just for being so ignorant. As a matter of fact I am going to bring this to their attention, they need to know about people like you. Have a wonderful day. (Even this site lacks normal intelligence, I had my name filled in, the checkbox checked and the verification entry filled in, clicked submit and this is what came up....For a comment to be approved the comment and a name must be filled in, the checkbox for accepting the terms must be checked, and the verification entry must be correct if not logged in.
So, I will try again. So if you are reading this, the second attempt worked out.
Concerned in Kearney
Fri Feb 13 2009 03:19
I, personally, am a fan of snark. But seriously, where was the editor? Who runs this paper!
Alan
Fri Feb 13 2009 03:10
Mary Louise,
I hope that at some point in your education you learn about comma splices and the correct spelling of tertiary.






log out