College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

New bill would make lap dances illegal

By Ryan Boetel

Print this article

Published: Monday, March 9, 2009

Updated: Monday, March 9, 2009

The Nebraska Legislature may soon decide to outlaw lap dances in the state.

LB443, a bill that would regulate adult and sexually orientated businesses, was introduced by Sen. Mark Christensen of Imperial to the General Affairs Committee on Monday afternoon. 

The bill would place zoning restrictions on strip clubs and other businesses that sell adult materials. The restrictions would keep those businesses a quarter mile from schools, childcare facilities, playgrounds, churches, public recreation buildings and houses.

Christensen also introduced an amendment to shrink the quarter mile zoning restriction to 1,000 feet. 

The bill would also regulate what goes on inside a strip club:  It would create a six foot buffer zone between stripper and patron.

That would put an end to common strip club practices such as having the stripper pluck a dollar bill from a patron with her G-string or certain body parts, and giving table and lap dances.

“I’ve heard the joking directed toward the bill and me for bringing what appears to be a frivolous moral crusade,” Christensen said during the hearing.  “What is so funny about the negative secondary effects of increased sexual crimes, thefts and the devaluation of property … What is so funny about an industry that exploits women as sexual objects?”

“Secondary effects” were one of the main arguments made by proponents of the bill. Secondary effects from strip clubs refer to an influx in crime rates for neighborhoods that have a strip or adult business nearby. A pamphlet containing studies done in 30 different cities by the National Law Center was handed to senators on the committee.

One of the studies, done in Phoenix, said the number of sex offenses in neighborhoods with a sexually orientated business were 506 percent higher than in neighborhoods without such a business.

A study done in the Times Square business district of New York City concluded that adult businesses drove down property value and increased criminal complaints in the area.

As the committee heard from seven proponents of the bill, talk slowly turned to testimony on the problems pornography makes for society.

Terry Rosseter, an Omaha man and member of the group Virtuous Men, said pornography is one of the most crippling addictions men can face.

“Pornography is simply a different kind of whore,” Rosseter said. “I’m sorry, it’s a prostitute of the mind.”

Amy Miller, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union in Nebraska, said the ACLU would fight the zoning restrictions the bill would place on businesses.

She said the pamphlet containing studies from the National Law Center doesn’t provide enough evidence on if crime rates in Nebraska are higher because of adult businesses. She said a study would have to be done in Nebraska before such conclusions could be reached.

After she was finished testifying, Miller said the other parts of the bill, such as the six-foot rule, are “censoring” in nature, but the ACLU wouldn’t be fighting the bill from that angle. They will have a greater chance of success going after the zoning restrictions, she said.

Ken Semeler was one of two club owners who spoke at the hearing in opposition to the bill.

Semeler, who owns The Night Before Lounge in Lincoln, said the six-foot rule would “basically put me out of business.”

“You can’t walk to the bathroom” at The Night Before Lounge without getting within six-feet of a stripper, he said.

He also said he didn’t understand the point of making strip clubs close earlier either.

“I’m not sure what happens at 11:05 that doesn’t happen at 10:55,” he said.

RYANBOETEl@DAILYNEBRASKAN.COM

 

 

 

Comments

3 comments
Me
Thu Apr 9 2009 23:56
These anti-porn crusaders are typically hypocrites. (See omaha-neb.com for examples from right here in Nebraska.) Censorship is criminal.
Raj
Wed Mar 11 2009 15:42
I agree with Stephanie. Also, no one is exploiting anyone. No one forces the women to strip. They do it of their own free will to make some money, extra or otherwise. Besides what happened to the "land of the free" slogan. How is a land of the free if one cant use their free will? They compare findings of "ONE" study in PHOENIX, AZ to the decades of practice in Lincoln, NE!!! There aren't even ANY studies to prove any increase in crime rates in the city because of sex-related businesses. If anything, they provide a vent to a certain segment of the populace who are not so fortunate as some others in the area of love/dating. Its not even like its a skin trade! I can understand the necessary and "REASONABLE" distance that a strip club has to be from a school, but why a church? Is the church afraid that they will lose their congregation to strippers?! What kind of weak spirited people are these, that would be so easily influenced by the lure of beautiful half-naked women who are supposedly taboo...because God said you shall not look at a naked woman(???)!! If anything, it means that the church needs to do a better job at "controlling" their congregations, rather than shutting down things THEY believe are "wrong". Its is nothing more than imposing their will on everyone else. Where is the freedom in this promised land?? Why not just let everyone make their own choices and exercise self-restraint instead of telling EVERYONE what to do? Shameless double standards!
Stephanie
Tue Mar 10 2009 00:08
Wow. Talk about ridiculous. The economy is crashing and millions are losing their jobs, but he wants to shut down strip clubs? Way to put already desperate people out of their jobs.