Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Board of Regents pass 4-percent tuition increase

Published: Sunday, June 14, 2009

Updated: Sunday, June 14, 2009 19:06

Tuition discussions dominated Friday's meeting of the University of Nebraska Board of Regents, where the board approved a 4 percent tuition increase for all NU campuses as part of the 2009-2010 budget.

The increase will raise tuition at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln from $179.75 to $187 per credit hour, an increase of $7.25.

The $737.6 million budget and 4 percent tuition increase received unanimous approval from the board. Regent Randy Ferlic said he usually votes against tuition increases, but in the current economic climate an increase was needed for NU to stay competitive with other universities.

"This particular budget with this environment is necessary to keep the dream alive," Ferlic said.  "I don't think we could have fashioned it better."

The 4 percent increase is NU's smallest tuition raise in more than a decade and about average for increases at campuses at NU's peer institutions this year.  Among UNL's peer institutions, the University of Kansas is projecting a 4 percent to 6 percent increase, while Colorado State University could see a 9 percent raise in tuition.

Around $8 million in revenue will be generated by the tuition increase and will cover expenses such as smaller raises to faculty salaries that help NU attract top professors, said NU President J.B. Milliken.

Several regents stressed that although the budget was passed quickly and without much debate, a significant amount of time and discussion went into planning it beforehand to ensure the best outcome for NU in the rough economy.

"Other than maybe 2001, there is more uncertainty with the budget process now than I've ever seen before," Regent Kent Schroeder said.

While the budget did increase tuition for next year, it also set aside more money for financial aid programs to help students offset the new costs.

Another $1.2 million in state funding will go toward a new student assistance fund as a one-time expenditure to help families with unexpected financial difficulties.

All things considered, though, the approved budget still leaves NU with an $8.5 million budget shortfall. A 1.5 percent funding increase from the Nebraska Legislature for next year wasn't enough to meet NU's increasing expenses in areas such as salaries and financial aid, and Milliken said further cuts are needed.

Faculty salary increases have already been reduced from 2.9 percent to 1.5 percent to help with the deficit, but Milliken said positions and entire programs could be cut to lower costs.

The board also approved separate tuition increases for the University of Nebraska Medical Center's Colleges of Dentistry and Nursing. These colleges were specifically chosen for additional increases because of the high salaries students have after graduating, making it easier for them to pay back tuition increases that benefit the entire NU system.

"These were precisely crafted increases as opposed to across the board increases," Regent Chuck Hassebrook said.

Milliken said the approved smaller tuition increases will help NU maintain its recent momentum and success during the country's economic troubles, while staying affordable compared to its peer institutions.

"In this difficult year, I think this is a responsible budget," he said.

The next Board of Regents meeting will be Sept. 4 at 1 p.m. at Varner Hall.

adamziegler@dailynebraskan.com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

5 comments

Anonymous
Sun Feb 7 2010 14:05
"If AGW really has been disproven, it will be disproven with science, not with people's private correspondence obtained by illegal means"

What science do you have to prove AGW? None.

Jack
Mon Nov 30 2009 19:56
I do not know where to make this known but the chancellor has decided to subvert the normal nationwide search for the Senior Vice chancellor for this university, essentially the second in command in this university, and nominate a woman who has had no experience in administration at ANY level, for the position. He made this announcement Monday in an email to the faculty, essentially stating that he wanted her in this position for a variety of meaningless reasons. Mrs Poser, a faculty member from Law college, who has never held any administrative position at any level seems to have a magical quality that allows her to enter this position after a meaningless "search" coopted by an impotent faculty senate executive committee. That someone with this staggering level of inexperience, think Sarah Palin, be considered makes one ask if the VCAA position ismeaningful. Do we have no one else who can perform this riole internally, or do we have to yield to Perlman's Machiavellian actions?
Justin
Wed Nov 25 2009 01:49
Let this information that supposedly disproves global warming be brought forth, then. If it doesn't exist, isn't that evidence that no such conspiracy exists to hide it, and you've dramatically misunderstood a great deal of correspondence taken out of context?

If AGW really has been disproven, it will be disproven with science, not with people's private correspondence obtained by illegal means.

"A scientific scandal is casting a shadow over a number of recent peer-reviewed climate papers."

Which papers? Be specific, with references.

AGW Fraud
Mon Nov 23 2009 23:48
Controversy has exploded onto the Internet after a major global-warming advocacy center in the UK had its e-mail system hacked and the data published on line. The director of the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit confirmed that the e-mails are genuine and Australian publication Investigate and the Australian Herald-Sun report that those e-mails expose a conspiracy to hide detrimental information from the public that argues against global warming.

A scientific scandal is casting a shadow over a number of recent peer-reviewed climate papers.

At least eight papers purporting to reconstruct the historical temperature record times may need to be revisited, with significant implications for contemporary climate studies, the basis of the IPCC’s assessments. A number of these involve senior climatologists at the British climate research centre CRU at the University East Anglia. In every case, peer review failed to pick up the errors.

Your name
Sat Nov 21 2009 11:39
Ben Nelson has taken part in the classic Potomac two-step of telling his constituents one thing in Nebraska and doing another thing back in Washington, D.C. Ben Nelson’s double-speak has not gone unnoticed by voters in Nebraska and now it looks like Nelson may take this double-speak on health care reform one step further by voting for government-run health care before voting against it. Politicians cannot have it both ways – just ask John Kerry. Nebraskans can spot a phony politician when they see one and they know that any vote to move the Democrats’ health care bill forward is a vote for a government-run health care experiment.

Call Senator Ben Nelson today at (202) 224-6551 and let him know:

* Any vote to move the Senate Democrats’ health care bill forward is a vote for President Obama’s government-run health care experiment at a time when unemployment has increased by nearly 14% since Obama took office.
* If Senator Nelson votes to move the Democrats’ health care bill forward, he is voting to raise Nebraskans’ health care costs, taxes, and premiums, all while cutting Medicare for the 270,435 beneficiaries in the state.
* The taxpayers of Nebraska can see through these parliamentary procedure games. They don’t want a flip flopper.
* Nebraskans want someone to keep the government from coming between them and their doctor.







log out