Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Athletes, faculty contend certain majors not 'easier'

Published: Monday, December 8, 2008

Updated: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 16:10

High-profile athletic departments across the country have struggled for years to shake the notion that athletes coast to graduation and scoop up "easy" degrees.


A recent USA Today investigation doesn't make the battle any easier.

As NCAA academic requirements tighten, some sports programs reportedly scramble to keep certain athletes academically eligible.

So how do they get traditionally under-performing student-athletes to squeak by? According to the USA Today report, they gravitate - in hefty blocs - toward the same majors. This may signal these disciplines have less rigorous curricula, according to the report.


USA Today analyzed the majors of upperclassmen student-athletes in five sports at 162 Division 1 colleges, including the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.


It found teammates tend to cluster within similar departments, some to an extreme degree.

For example, all seven of the upperclassmen on the University of Texas at El Paso's men's basketball team majored in multidisciplinary studies last year, as did 21 of 29 on the football squad.

According to the report, 40 percent of juniors and seniors on NU's 2007-2008 baseball team and 30.4 percent of juniors and seniors on the football team majored in sociology.

The Daily Nebraskan analyzed this year's Husker basketball, softball, volleyball, baseball and football rosters using media guides and the university's Web site. Only athletes with declared majors were considered for the analysis.


Of the 81 football players with declared majors, 17.3 percent are in sociology, and 19.8 percent are business administration majors.

Slightly more than 22 percent of baseball players are pursuing degrees in sociology.

These tallies fall below USA Today's 25 percent benchmark that signifies a non-random cluster. However, 38.5 percent of men's basketball players major in sociology.

Communication studies attracts 30 percent of the volleyball team and 27.2 percent of softball players.

Using the report's 25 percent standard, NU basketball, softball and volleyball players aren't coincidentally traveling similar degree paths.

Athletes don't flock to similar areas of study because they're easy, said the chairmen for UNL's sociology and communication studies departments.

Dan Hoyt, sociology professor and department chairman, said sociology's focus on diversity often lures athletes – many of whom are minorities – to the discipline.

Out of UNL's 18,526 enrolled undergraduates, 204 are sociology majors, according to Registration and Records. 

Nearly 14 percent of sociology majors, or 28 of the 204, play baseball, men's basketball, volleyball or football, according to the DN analysis.


As for communication studies, department chairman Bill Seiler said he isn't clear about what attracts athletes, but he realizes it's an area athletes drift toward.

Twenty-three of the 239 undergraduates, nearly 10 percent, pursuing communication studies degrees are on the baseball, women's basketball, softball, football or volleyball rosters.

Justin Baumgartner, a senior sociology major and long snapper for the football team, said sharing a major with 13 teammates hasn't made college a breeze.

Sure, sociology may not be as time-demanding as some majors, and it's nice to collaborate with teammates for homework, he admitted, but "you still have to study for all your tests just as hard."

Baumgartner, a transfer student from Cheyenne, Wyo., said he chose sociology because he's thinking about landing in public relations, and he's good with people – not because advisers pushed him down a "simpler" path.

When asked about the stereotype of coddled athletes, he responded, "We still do the work that all the other sociology majors do, but they're not getting the bad rep" for pursuing an "easy" degree.

"When people say we can coast by, that's a joke. ...I haven't seen a teacher at Nebraska who lets you coast by just because you're an athlete."


teresalostroh@dailynebraskan.com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

4 comments

JC
Tue Dec 9 2008 14:42
I don't know if all of these majors are inherently easier, but the program here does push for them. My roommate was a student athlete who was told she couldn't be a psych major, she had her choice of communication or sociology.
ch
Tue Dec 9 2008 11:11
I agree with Troy, there are probably several athletes who could handle a chemical engineering degree, unfortunately because of the time demands of playing on a sports program, they are being held back from fulfilling their true potential. It's truly saddening that sports programs take precedence over academia in many Division 1 schools...these athletes COULD pursue more challenging degrees in areas that may be more interesting to them however the demands of their sports schedules doesn't allow it. And if the sports teams don't win, the alumni close their checkbooks.
Troy Wiegand
Tue Dec 9 2008 10:19
"becasue the material isn't difficult"
Troy Wiegand
Tue Dec 9 2008 10:18
Whether or not a major is harder or easier has nothing to do with how many athletes pursue that major. A major is easier simply because of the material that one has to master to graduate. Sociology, Political Science, History, English, and others are considered lower majors becasue the materials isn't difficult and the expectation of the faculty that teach these classes are pitifully low. Also the people that choose these majors would have a difficult time in a more rigorous discipline. To clarify this, there are harder and easier majors. Why do you think engineers get paid more than teachers? They both have bachelor’s degrees. One is just much harder to get than the other. Athletes pursue easier majors simply because they don’t have the time that a regular student does to devote to labs and studying. There are probably several athletes that could handle a ChemEng program if they just had the time.






log out