Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

ASUN candidates debate sustainability on campus

Published: Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Updated: Thursday, February 25, 2010 23:02


At the second debate for the Association of Students of the University of Nebraska elections, the executive board candidates focused on sustainability and diversity on campus.

The debate was moderated by the Environmental Resource Center, the Progressive Student Coalition and the Queer Student Alliance.

The first question concerned sustainability and what the parties would do to make the campus more sustainable.

FUSION's presidential candidate Reid DeSpiegelaere, a junior history major, said the party would like to expand what ASUN could do with the Athletic Department, saying there could be recycling after more sports events, such as volleyball games, and not just before and after football games.

He also cited FUSION's carpool pass plan, which would allow communal parking for students.

"We're the only party that has a mainstream platform that is geared around sustainability," he said.

Kiana Mathew, a sophomore agricultural sciences major and the internal vice presidential candidate for FUSION, also talked about drafting a green constitution that would create a custom and tailor-made recycling program for each building on campus, so students can have better accessibility.

RENEW's presidential candidate Cori Curtis, a senior international relations and political science major, said, "You have to launch a cultural movement that is launched from your peers."

The candidates in the RENEW Party have proven that sustainability was more than just a catch phrase, he said.

It is getting the students behind a common vision and working tangibly towards those goals, Curtis said. Curtis continued that he, along with his two candidates for external and internal vice president Sammy Nabulsi, a junior political science major and Katherine White, a junior music major, can make the university a leader in sustainability.

What sets RENEW apart from the other parties is that it wants to get one common message across about sustainability on campus, he said.

The presidential candidate for N VISION Justin Solomon, a junior family sciences major, emphasized the need for sustainable language in the project contracts UNL makes with outside businesses.

"I would like to point out that we're the only party that seems to think sustainable language in university contracts is a good thing," he said.

He also spoke out against FUSION's carpool platform.

"If we're going to look at other carpool systems, we also have to point out that students who are co-habitating here at the university will not be able to share the same carpool permit," he said. "That's a problem."

FUSION's external vice presidential candidate Emily Schlichting, a junior political science major, rebutted these remarks. "I would like to see the research and the rules that state that people who live together cannot share a carpool pass," she said, "because the one we modeled ours off of does allow that."

Currently, the university does not have employee plus one benefits, and the parties debated that.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

6 comments

Anonymous
Sat Feb 27 2010 21:40
I wish Fusion candidates would find something better to do than sitting on the DN website and commenting.
Clarification
Sat Feb 27 2010 15:05
Just to add on to that last anonymous post, not only were the N VISION execs not at the Culture Center's closing and APU event, ALL of the FUSION execs were at both events. The FUSION execs were unable to make it to the Empowerment Forum (seeing as it was an all-day affair and they had classes/work.) ...I completely agree with the most recent anonymous post - diversity is a daily commitment, and FUSION has shown their commitment, this week more than ever. (See the video of the most recent ASUN senate meeting as evidence.)
Anonymous
Sat Feb 27 2010 12:08
"Going to do" and "did" are two different things. Great to know that several days after the meeting, NVISION would have been willing to vote differently for a variety of reasons, no doubt including the publicity and attention paid to the issue. Great governance.

Anonymous #3L Last night, I was at the Culture Center's Closing Ceremony and APU's Black History Month Celebration. No NVISION candidates whatsoever were at either campus diversity event. Attending one event a year does not make you a proponent of diversity--it's a daily committment.

Anonymous
Fri Feb 26 2010 14:50
Can I just add that none of Fusion's exec candidates were at the Empowerment Forum today. So don't say they weren't for diversity.

Also, The N VISION candidates would have voted for the next bill, guaranteed. Don't try to twist what happened if you don't really know what they were going to do.

Anonymous
Fri Feb 26 2010 12:41
When it came to diversity initiatives the night before, both N Vision's Presidential Candidate and Internal VP Candidate voted against UNITE, the Native American group, in fear of 6 student's "feelings". When it came to a vote to table the bill, indefinately, both of N Vision's Exec candidates voted yes. So much for wanting diversity and being diverse. Not to mention another one of their candidates, Matt Kelly, turned the concern into a blame saying that he feels offended and feels like they, UNITE, are calling him racist.

Fusion's Execs were in the crowd the entire night, and did not say anything. But their candidates already on senate, said a lot in defense of the bill and UNITE. They really cared about diversity initiatives.

Renew, well, none of the execs were there. So I don't know if they were too busy or what.

Anonymous
Fri Feb 26 2010 01:58
As an undecided voter at this debate, I can honestly say N VISION outperformed the other groups. It was funny to me because I thought the other parties would have the upper hand in this debate, but N VISION showed their versatility. Definitely rose up on this one. They have my vote.






log out