STAFF ED: Cultural insensitivity deserves timely, adequate response

By Staff Editorial

Published: Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Updated: Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Cultural sensitivity is an ideal that is becoming more important as our society becomes more pluralistic. Long gone are the days when flippantly throwing around racial, ethnic and gender-related slurs was accepted as a part of life. With so many different groups making up our society, we need to be careful not to exploit or demean another culture when in public.

A group of University of Nebraska-Lincoln students forgot the above consideration on Nov. 7 at a Husker football game against the Oklahoma Sooners. The group of students donned Native American headdresses and brandished signs that read "We Want Our Land Back." Innocent as the incident may sound to insensitive white ears, several Native Americans on campus were highly offended, given the fact that the name "Sooners" has a particular historical reference to Native Americans, especially in relation to the signs displayed.

The University of Nebraska Inter-Tribal Exchange, a Native American student organization on campus, has been trying to get the Association of Students of the University of Nebraska to acknowledge the offense and offer a solution ever since that game. ASUN has not yet directly dealt with anything.

At first, ASUN listened to the complaint and considered it, drafting a senate bill generally in support of cultural sensitivity, but saying next to nothing about the issue at hand. This was not good enough, and, to their credit, UNITE kept fighting. The glib dismissal of their concerns by ASUN was inexcusable. There's no reason a simple statement condemning UNL's village idiots should take four months to release.

Thankfully, UNITE has since had a senator draft an adequate bill which directly addresses their complaint and offers a more direct path to working on cultural sensitivity. Where the first bill, submitted by President Megan Collins, offered no real solution to the problem, the second bill, drafted by Senator Justin Shilhanek, outlined a path to working directly with the athletic department and a specified Fan Behavior Committee to improve cultural sensitivity at UNL sporting events. The new bill also directs the Diversity Strategic Development Committee to pursue educational programming with UNITE to emphasize educational opportunities presented by the incident.

We applaud Senator Shilhanek for having the intelligence to offer an effective bill. Meanwhile, we lament the current administration's failure to meaningfully recognize the seriousness of the issue as well as the initial insensitivity of the fools who wore the headdresses in the first place. Hopefully this bill will improve the cultural sensitivity of UNL as a whole, and will prevent similar incidents from happening in the future.

opinion@dailynebraskan.com

 

Comments

2 comments
Anonymous
Fri Feb 26 2010 14:18
"Innocent as the incident may sound to insensitive white ears, several Native Americans on campus were highly offended, given the fact that the name “Sooners” has a particular historical reference to Native Americans, especially in relation to the signs displayed."

The incident still sounds innocent to me and my non-white ears. I'm Mexican, Native American, and Caucasian (which I think is more politically correct than you calling us "white". Why don't you practice what you preach, DN Editorial Staff? Cultural insensitivity includes being insensitive to the "whites" as well.)

Being triracial, if I took offense every time someone did something as benignly culturally insensitive as this, I would be a very angry person. Although I applaud UNITE for using this event as a teaching opportunity about Native American culture, anyone who is still angry over this (including the DN Ed Staff) really needs to get over it. Save your anger for bigger battles, maybe ones in which the perpetrators are actually insulting or attacking our culture on purpose. Many of the students involved have already offered their apologies. It is clear that they did not intentionally mean any harm.

(For the record, I am very disappointed in the DN's choice of words when talking about those who dressed up at the game. Many have offered apologies and it is unnecessary for you to continue to defame their character.)

Offended
Wed Feb 24 2010 12:59
Let me get this straight....freedom of speech is ok, except when it offends an ethnic group. Therefore, "F OU" painted on the guy's belly was not an issue? Come on, ASUN, use your heads!

I have a tough time understanding why those bozos weren't escorted out of the game for both the insulting attire and the vulgarity. Perhaps NU is trying to encourage fans to act as immature as Mizzou's Antlers?

View full site