Today marks the 100th day since Occupy Lincoln protesters first marched through downtown and set up camp on Centennial Mall. That camp has outlasted the original Occupy Wall Street in Manhattan, along with dozens more across the country.
On Saturday, they marked the occasion in a way befitting the movement that mobilized last September to fight money's influence over politics: They held another march.
It may be one of the last that launches from the Mall campsite. Earlier this month the city ordered the camp to leave by March 1, making way for renovation work on the green space that might begin this summer.
"The city has given us an eviction notice," read a flier posted at the camp during the weekend that asked for support more psychological than material. "They say no one supports us. Prove them wrong."
Protesters bustled around, preparing for the march and cooking lunch as more walked over.
"Soup's ready!" called out William Matchett, a 30-year-old handyman and poet and constant fixture at the food tent, steam from chicken soup billowing around his ginger beard.
The 20 or so marchers, drumming and chanting, made a small contingent. But the group's route up and down O Street echoed the drumbeat and chants of the past several months.
The nearly 500 Lincoln residents who turned out for the first march Oct. 15, for example, brought together by a wish to reform a political system they see as stacked against them by wealthy interests and corporations.
Or the demonstration Nov. 5 at Wells Fargo, in protest of the federal bailout the bank received, that led to the Lincoln protest's only arrests. The Rev. Jesse Jackson, a civil rights icon, visiting the camp a few weeks later.
As fall became winter, other Occupy campsites fell like the leaves. New York City, Los Angeles, Denver, Indianapolis and Omaha all evicted their occupations in November. San Antonio, New Orleans and Boston — one of the last major holdouts — followed.
Lincoln's own camp, however, is very much alive, outlasting camps in cities 40 times Lincoln's size.
"I'm speechless about it," said Dana Garrison, a junior agricultural education major at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln who often acts as a spokeswoman for the protest. "This is one of the most powerful things to be involved with."
The camp benefited from open communication with Lincoln's law enforcement and research of city law. Centennial Mall became Occupy Lincoln's home, for example, because the public right-of-way has no curfew. But the campers, who've dwindled in number as most retreated indoors, might add something else.
"You might not see a lot of occupiers, but the community is with us," said Jo Tetherow, 60, as she held aloft her "Regulate the Banksters" sign. Tetherow has camped out, through sub-freezing temperatures, all but three of Occupy Lincoln's days.
She joined largely out of disgust with large banks, which she said pressured her to fudge her numbers as a real estate appraiser before the housing market collapsed several years ago.
Tetherow was extremely skeptical of the city's claim that it needs the entire Mall as a staging area for this year's renovation work. On Saturday, she called on Lincoln to raise its voice in support of the camp.
"We need them to call the mayor," Tetherow said. "Call the city council. Write the city council."
Some protesters said Occupy Lincoln would live on with or without its camp and adapt, as protests around the country have done.
Despite their evictions, for example, occupiers in New York, Oakland, Denver and Albany have continued to hold marches and protests. Many have shifted to local politics and economic problems, with Occupy Atlanta and others helping families facing foreclosure.
Last week also featured coordinated protests on the second anniversary of the Citizens United decision from the U.S. Supreme Court, which essentially unhitched corporations from political spending limits.
Occupy Lincoln has joined this "Move to Amend" movement.
Several members regularly call on the Lincoln City Council to join other cities in adopting a resolution against the decision, an effort to build momentum from the bottom up.
"It's not sustainable to remain camping forever, to be realistic," said Jeffrey Eggerss, a UNL sophomore communication and international studies major, early this month. There's been some discussion of finding an alternate site, he added.
But Occupy Lincoln wasn't waiting to fade away even before the city's announcement.
The new year brought "Occupy Education," a project that aims to share the expertise and knowledge at the collective fingertips of Occupy Lincoln's members. At least one UNL professor and several Lincoln residents not attached to Occupy have joined that effort.
At the protest's general assembly meeting Sunday afternoon at Indigo Bridge Books, most of the about 20 present weren't campers, but all were familiar faces. As a whole, the protesters seemed to remain optimistic and productive, perhaps focused by the city's ultimatum.
Proposals to reorganize several committees and reinvigorate the protest's message and media presence, along a meeting Sunday evening on the camp's defense come March, demonstrated the movement's heart is still pumping.
"I think this is the best G.A. I've ever been to," Tetherow said to the others, seated in wooden chairs and surrounded by colorful bookshelves. "We've shown now today we can work as a team."
Earlier, as the Saturday march wound down, the marchers repeated the movement's signature chant, crafted to bring attention to the country's significant income inequality.
"We are the 99 percent," they shouted. In the beat of silence between repetitions, one man added: "And we're still here!"
Danholtmeyer@dailynebraskan.com

Nobody should be denied education because of their socioeconomic status; nobody should be forced into overwhelming debt for a degree. As curious and creative creatures, education is something that should be a basic part of who we are for our entire lives. Education should not merely be a necessary.....Ironic considering most of these people were skipping classes in high school to smoke dope.
You see the truth is that LB3 and his anon brothers and sisters at Occupy Lincoln never thought that they were part of the general public, They just assumed that they spoke for us, that they were our managers. Like the benighted fellow who occupies the White House they see us as the cattle and themselves as the ranchers. And ranchers don't like it when the cattle don't heed their commands and assume that they have minds of their own.
It just makes the rancher hopping mad and unable to occupy the high ground.
Dubious grammar isn't, of course, fatal to a movement, but it serves to illustrate how ultimately futile it is for 30,000 people in New York City and tens of thousands more around the world to fight for an idea by shouting it from the sideline to get everyone's attention, but not taking the next logical -- and necessary -- step, which is to take action.
In a very real sense, Occupy Wall Street had us at hello. But they kept talking so much and not taking action that people finally lost interest. This unpleasant fact is reflected in the latest USA Today poll, which finds that six out of 10 Americans are indifferent to the Occupy movement.
A Tea Party Moment
Last month, in criticizing the movement, Ginia Bellafante of the New York Times defined it as "a diffuse and leaderless convocation of activists against greed, corporate influence, gross social inequality and other nasty byproducts of wayward capitalism." That description (minus the snarky tone) is pretty much the consensus of many analysts. Yet, that is not why the movement failed. That description was also leveled against the Tea Party movement in its first months of existence. It too was widely criticized as being "diffuse and leaderless." Yet, by most accounts, the Tea Party succeeded far beyond anyone's expectation.
Even labeled with the same criticisms and failing to capture a majority of public support, the "diffuse and leaderless" Tea Party movement quickly took off and became a major force in American politics for one significant difference -- it took action. Unlike Occupy Wall Street, it did more than shout its messages from the sideline and disrupt political speeches: it aggressively identified and backed politicians who supported its causes and it rewarded, at the voting booth, those who publicly embraced them. At the height of its popularity, during the 2010 election cycle, 138 candidates for Congress identified themselves as Tea Party supporters.
While the Tea Party seems to have folded agreeably into the Republican Party, it continues to be a factor today because it remains firmly focused on the political process, as illustrated by the televised debate in September on CNN, which featured the 2012 GOP presidential hopefuls vying for their support. True, one can make the case that most politicians merely pander to the Tea Party to get its vote -- but then again, that's what politicians do to every group. The point is that the Tea Party made itself a force to be reckoned with.
Home Alone
In an ironically revealing article, Capital New York related a meeting last Friday at the SEIU building in Manhattan, where about 170 protesters regrouped following their ouster from Zuccotti Park in an overnight raid by New York City police. According to the writer, Matthew Wolfe, when organizers asked protesters to voice their top priorities, "the group seemed focused on short-term logistical goals (such as food and shelter) ... few speakers mentioned ... long-term political aims."
Regardless of where the rag-tag remnant of Occupy Wall Street makes its new home, organizers will likely find it to be a lonely existence. We're all sympathetic to dissatisfied coworkers who complain about their jobs. But when we realize they don't mean to do anything but whine, we quickly dismiss them.
The Sept. 12, 2009 Tea Party demonstration in Washington, D.C., is a perfect example of the way Tea Partiers do business. Organizers planned for 100,000 Tea Party activists to show up on the National Mall, but more than one million turned out. In spite of the huge group of people, there was never an "angry mob" mentality. Protestors said "excuse me" and "thank you." No one was arrested and no property was damaged. No one told us to, but we picked up every bit of trash, even if it was not ours. In only a month of much smaller Occupy-related protests, hundreds of people have been arrested from New York City to San Diego and abroad, and in some cases protesters have resorted to physical violence. The property damage has been significant.
When the Tea Party demonstrates, we get permits. We cooperate with police. We fund porta-potties. We respect the rule of law and are responsible for meeting our own needs including food, water, shelter, medical care and bathrooms. The Occupy protestors just showed up and took over a busy part of Lower Manhattan, using local businesses' bathrooms as their own personal washrooms - or worse - and even refusing to temporarily leave Zuccotti Park so it could be cleaned for their own safety and hygiene.
But the biggest difference between the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street is that the Tea Party is bound by a common set of values based on freedom, responsibility and property rights. While the Tea Party members hold a diverse set of views on many issues, they are united in a desire for less government, lower taxes and more freedom. Conversely, the Occupy Wall Street protesters are unified only by their hatred of the wealthy, and seem to take pride in the movement's inability to present a coherent set of proactive initiatives. Their attacks are disturbingly similar to those levied against the rich in Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged," where punishing the most productive members of society was more important than fixing the nation's problems.
The values that inform and shape Tea Party demonstrations also require the Tea Party to be consistent in applying its principles. We are willing to hold both Republicans and Democrats accountable, as well as bad actors and crony capitalists on Wall Street. We support capitalism based on hard work and wealth creation, not crony capitalism based on whom you know in Washington, D.C. That's why we opposed the Wall Street bailout, handouts to GE and Solyndra, insurance companies writing individual mandates in ObamaCare, and Car Czars choosing winners and losers in the automobile industry.
Occupy Wall Street, on the other hand, suffers from cognitive dissonance. They say they oppose special favors to Wall Street but their so-called "progressive" leaders who are waging the same kind of class warfare in Washington, starting with Barack Obama, are the enablers of bad actors on Wall Street. Big banks and investment firms were among Obama's top donors in 2008, including Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase & Co, Citigroup, UBS AG and Morgan Stanley.
The one anon had it right: "It's a hard movement to get behind, it's full of a bunch of hipsters and rebels, a lot of these people are just angry because they messed up or did something they shouldn't have and they want to blame the system, because nothing is their fault the government needs to take care of them. "
Other supplies that we're most in need of now are:
-megaphone
-4 Season Tents under 400 Sq Ft.
-blankets/sleeping bags
-thermals
-gloves
-a projector for showing movies
-tupperware, totes and small file boxes
-tarps
-campfire cooking gear: 16.4 propane cans and isobutane for M.R.S. stoves
-poles and stakes
-food/water and juice (non-perishable)
-canned meat (tuna, etc)
-trash bags and trash cans
-flash lights
-first aid supplies (bandages, antibiotic ointment)
(Don't forget the rats, their our brothers)
All We Are Saying is Give Fleas a Chance!
(And the Lice they need a home to)
All We Are Saying is give Fleas a Chance!
(And the Bed Bugs, you'll never sleep alone with them)
Their free!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! free!!!!!!!!!!!!!! free!!!!!!!!!!!!
Our tents have been gently used. In fact some have never been used at all. So come down today and pick up a tent
(Tent claimants most pay for fumigation expenses.)